.png)
Cannabis, nicotine, and alcohol brands face more than ordinary SMS marketing requirements. A business may obtain customer permission and follow federal telemarketing rules, yet still be unable to send messages because its provider prohibits the product category. Legal consent and carrier approval are separate questions.
Understanding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) helps regulated brands evaluate consent, opt-outs, records, and potential liability before launching campaigns. It also helps identify when marketing strategies for regulated industries, such as eligible email, SEO, and direct mail, provide a more practical path to customer retention.

The TCPA is a federal law governing certain calls and texts, including restrictions on automated communications and telephone solicitation. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) implements many of its requirements through 47 CFR § 64.1200.
Consent requirements depend on the sending technology, message purpose, do-not-call rules, and state laws.
The Supreme Court's 2021 Facebook v. Duguid decision narrowed the federal autodialer definition without eliminating state laws or other messaging requirements.
Cannabis, hemp-derived CBD, tobacco, vaping, and alcohol products do not face identical messaging policies. Some providers restrict particular campaigns, while others prohibit the underlying business category.
For example, Twilio's forbidden message categories prohibit cannabis and CBD businesses from using its U.S. and Canadian SMS/MMS services regardless of message content. Twilio also prohibits vaping and e-cigarette messaging on the listed U.S. routes, while allowing qualifying U.S. alcohol messaging with appropriate age verification.
Regulated SMS programs must be assessed across three separate areas:
Neither 10DLC registration nor customer consent overrides a prohibited business category. Confirm eligibility in writing before investing.
.png)
The FCC generally requires prior express written consent for telemarketing calls or texts using covered automatic dialing technology. Informational communications may involve a different federal consent standard. Other legal and provider requirements can still apply even when the technology does not meet the federal autodialer definition.
Under the FCC's written-consent definition, agreements must authorize the seller's covered marketing messages to an identified number. Consent cannot be a purchase condition, and electronic signatures may qualify.
A defensible marketing signup typically includes:
Double opt-in strengthens consent evidence but cannot authorize a prohibited messaging use case.
The FCC's proposed one-to-one and related-topic restrictions were vacated in January 2025. Businesses must still secure valid consent covering the actual campaign.
.png)
Recipients may revoke permission by reasonable methods, including STOP or other clear requests.
The FCC's rule generally requires applicable revocation requests to be honored within a reasonable time, no longer than 10 business days. Processing should be faster whenever possible, and suppression should take effect across the relevant messaging workflow.
On January 6, 2026, the FCC extended a limited waiver until January 31, 2027. The delay concerns the requirement to apply an opt-out from one type of informational message to unrelated future calls or texts from the same sender. It does not suspend existing opt-out obligations or grant permission to continue sending messages after a valid revocation.
Businesses should also review national and applicable state do-not-call requirements, along with the federal telemarketing window generally running from 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. at the recipient's location. More restrictive state or provider rules may apply.
An opt-in is difficult to substantiate when the business cannot show what the customer agreed to. Reliable records help resolve customer complaints, provider reviews, and legal disputes.
Record retention is not governed by a universal four- or five-year TCPA consent rule. Businesses should establish a documented retention period based on applicable requirements, potential claims, and privacy obligations. Separately, the FCC's company-specific do-not-call rules require certain opt-out requests to be honored for five years.
Maintain exportable records, restrict data access, and update procedures when forms or providers change. Email permission is not SMS consent.
.png)
For covered violations under 47 U.S.C. § 227, private plaintiffs may seek actual monetary loss or statutory damages of $500 per violation, whichever is greater. A court may increase the statutory award to as much as $1,500 for a willful or knowing violation.
These figures are potential damages, not automatic fines per text. Actual liability depends on the violation, defenses, and court findings.
Other risks include litigation expenses, complaints, and provider suspension.
Federal TCPA compliance does not replace state telemarketing, privacy, or product-advertising obligations. Three states illustrate why national campaigns need jurisdiction-specific review.
Texas SB 140 expanded telephone-solicitation rules to cover texts in September 2025. However, Texas Secretary of State guidance says prior-consent texters do not need Chapter 302 registration under the state agencies' current litigation position. Other Texas requirements may apply. No blanket $5,000-per-text penalty should be assumed.
Florida Statutes § 501.059 expressly covers certain sales-related text messages and establishes its own consent and opt-out rules. Businesses messaging Florida consumers should assess that statute rather than assume federal autodialer standards control every state-law obligation.
California's Consumer Privacy Act governs aspects of personal-information handling. The state's published penalty thresholds are privacy-law penalties, not an automatic 2,500-to-7,500 surcharge on every TCPA text. Applicable marketing, privacy, and cannabis-specific rules should be evaluated separately.
SMS eligibility and consent controls should be established before importing contacts or activating campaigns.
The FCC's Reassigned Numbers Database may help identify numbers disconnected since consent was obtained. Using it is optional, not a universal requirement to check every 45 days.
Evaluate providers on actual permission to serve the business category, documented registration support, opt-out handling, usable record exports, and reporting. Avoid claims that changing numbers, disguising product language, or linking to age-gated pages automatically makes prohibited messages acceptable.
When the business or messaging use case is prohibited, the appropriate response is to select another eligible channel. Email, SEO, editorial content, and direct mail offer different ways to acquire and retain customers, subject to their own laws and provider policies.
For example, cannabis email retention marketing allows consent-based customer education and segmented campaigns. Email remains subject to provider policies and the CAN-SPAM Act.
First-party data is especially valuable because it can support eligible channels without assuming access to every advertising or messaging platform.
.png)
Herb Agency approaches restricted-category marketing through channel eligibility, audience development, and measurable performance. Its experience is strongest in cannabis and hemp, with capabilities relevant to other regulated markets when adapted to their specific requirements.
The agency's marketing services include:
Herb Agency's DynaVap campaign collected 52,714 email contacts in 2024, achieving a 51.71% open rate and 22.32% click rate. These results highlight the potential of first-party email marketing for regulated brands.
For regulated brands, the objective is to use channels that are both available and commercially useful. Businesses can book a strategy call with Herb Agency to discuss acquisition and retention approaches suited to their product categories.